Managing Performance Issues for Remote Kenyan Employees

August 06, 2026 7 min read
Managing Performance Issues for Remote Kenyan Employees

Remote work has become a permanent feature of Kenya's employment landscape. While the Employment Act, 2007 does not contain a standalone remote-work statute, all existing employment protections apply equally to remote employees. This creates a unique challenge: how do you identify, document, and address poor performance when you cannot observe work in person?

2. The Legal Foundation

2.1 No Separate Remote Work Law

Kenya has no dedicated remote-work legislation. Remote employees are governed by:

  • Employment Act, 2007 (Cap. 226): contracts, termination, disciplinary procedures

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (Article 41): right to fair labour practices

  • Data Protection Act, 2019: monitoring and surveillance of remote workers

  • Occupational Safety and Health Act, 2007: employer's duty of care extends to the remote workstation

  • Employment contract and remote work policy/agreement: the primary document defining expectations

2.2 Key Principle: Same Standards, Same Protections

The ELRC applies the same substantive and procedural fairness tests to remote employees. Working from home does not lower the threshold for lawful termination, nor does it excuse the employer from following due process.

3. Remote Work Agreements

Before performance issues can be fairly managed, clear expectations must be established. A robust remote work agreement should address:

Element

What to Include

Place of work

Designated remote location (Section 10, Employment Act requires this)

Working hours & availability

Core hours, response-time expectations, time-zone alignment

Performance metrics

KPIs, deliverables, output-based targets (not hours logged)

Communication protocols

Mandatory check-ins, reporting frequency, platforms to be used

Equipment & connectivity

Who provides what; minimum internet standards

Monitoring & data protection

What is tracked (e.g. project management tools, time trackers), consent requirements under the Data Protection Act

Review & amendment

How often the arrangement is reviewed; right to revoke remote privileges

4. Identifying Performance Issues in a Remote Setting

Remote work masks problems that are visible in an office. Common indicators include:

  • Missed deadlines consistently without adequate explanation

  • Declining quality of output (errors, incomplete work, superficial deliverables)

  • Communication failures: unresponsive during core hours, missing meetings, delayed replies beyond agreed timelines

  • Low engagement: camera-off, minimal participation, disengagement from team collaboration

  • Failure to meet measurable KPIs (sales targets, tickets resolved, reports submitted, etc.)

  • Client or colleague complaints about responsiveness or quality

5. The Performance Management Process (Step by Step)

Kenyan courts, particularly in the landmark cases of Jane Samba Mukala v Ol Tukai Lodge Limited [2013] and Vincent Namai v National Bank of Kenya [2023], have outlined a clear sequence that employers must follow. This applies equally to remote employees:

Step 1: Identify and Document the Gap

  • Compare actual performance against documented KPIs, targets, or job description requirements.

  • Collect objective evidence: missed deadlines, error rates, client feedback, system logs, project management data.

  • For remote workers, digital evidence is critical: emails, task completion records, time-stamp data, meeting attendance logs.

Step 2: Informal Discussion (Verbal Counselling)

  • Hold a one-on-one conversation (video call is acceptable) to discuss the performance gap.

  • Explore root causes: is it a skills issue, workload issue, personal circumstance, or lack of resources/connectivity?

  • Document the discussion with a written follow-up email summarising what was discussed and agreed.

  • Remote-specific consideration: Ensure the employee has adequate tools, internet connectivity, and a suitable workspace. If the employer has not provided these, the performance gap may not be the employee's fault.

Step 3: Formal Written Warning

If performance does not improve after informal discussion:

  • Issue a written warning specifying:

    • The exact areas of underperformance (with evidence)

    • The expected standard

    • The timeframe for improvement

    • The support the employer will provide

    • The consequences of continued underperformance

  • Serve the warning via email and follow up with a hard copy where possible.

  • The warning should reference the employee's right to respond.

Step 4: Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)

The PIP is now considered essential by Kenyan courts before any termination for poor performance. Based on Mukala v Ol Tukai and subsequent ELRC jurisprudence, a valid PIP must include:

PIP Element

Requirement

Specific targets

Clearly defined, measurable goals tied to the role

Timeline

Reasonable duration (typically 30 to 90 days depending on the role)

Support measures

Training, coaching, mentorship, additional resources, adjusted workload

Regular check-ins

Scheduled review meetings (weekly or bi-weekly)

Documentation

Written records of each review meeting and the employee's progress

Clear consequences

Statement that failure to meet targets may result in further action, including termination

Remote-Specific PIP Considerations:

  • Use output-based metrics, not activity monitoring. Courts are likely to view invasive surveillance unfavourably.

  • Schedule check-ins via video call at consistent times. Record attendance and discussion points.

  • Provide digital tools to track progress transparently (shared dashboards, project boards, shared documents).

  • Account for connectivity challenges: if the employee is in a region with unreliable internet, build this into expectations.

  • Get written acknowledgement of the PIP from the employee (email confirmation or digital signature is sufficient).

Step 5: PIP Review and Decision

At the end of the PIP period:

  • Assess performance against the documented targets.

  • If improved: document the improvement, continue monitoring, and close the PIP.

  • If partially improved: consider extending the PIP with adjusted targets.

  • If not improved: proceed to the disciplinary/termination process.

6. The Disciplinary Hearing (Section 41, Employment Act)

If the PIP fails and the employer considers termination, the following process must be followed:

  1. Written notice to the employee of the hearing, specifying:

    • The allegations of continued poor performance

    • The date, time, and format of the hearing (video call is acceptable for remote employees)

    • The employee's right to be accompanied by a fellow employee or union representative

    • Sufficient time to prepare a response (at least 48 hours; best practice is 5 working days)

  2. Conduct the hearing fairly:

Present the evidence of poor performance (PIP records, appraisals, KPI data)

  • Allow the employee to respond fully

  • Consider any mitigating factors raised

  • For remote hearings: ensure a stable connection, record the session (with consent), and provide a written summary afterwards

  1. Make a decision and communicate it in writing:

  • If termination: state clear reasons referencing the performance history

  • Provide the notice period (or payment in lieu)

  • Calculate and pay all terminal dues promptly

Can a Disciplinary Hearing Be Held Virtually?

Yes. There is no legal requirement for physical presence. However, employers should:

  • Ensure the employee has access to the technology

  • Offer an alternative if the employee faces connectivity issues

  • Record the session (with consent) for evidentiary purposes

  • Provide written minutes or a transcript

7. Monitoring Remote Employees: Legal Boundaries

The Data Protection Act, 2019 and the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) guidance impose limits on employee monitoring:

Permitted

Problematic

Tracking task/project completion

Continuous screenshot capture without consent

Monitoring login/logout times for core hours

Keystroke logging or webcam surveillance

Reviewing work output and quality

Accessing personal files or communications

Email monitoring (with policy disclosure)

Covert monitoring without notice

GPS tracking for field roles (with consent)

Location tracking for desk-based remote workers

8. Special Considerations for Remote Workers

Mental Health and Isolation

Remote work can bring mental health challenges. Before attributing performance decline to negligence, consider whether the employee is struggling with isolation, burnout, or mental health issues. The duty of care extends to psychological wellbeing.

Time Zones and Cross-Border Issues

If the remote employee is in a different time zone (e.g. a Kenyan employee working for a Nairobi-headquartered company while based in the diaspora), performance expectations must account for reasonable working hours under Kenyan law (maximum 52 hours per week).

Right to Disconnect

While Kenya has no explicit "right to disconnect" law, excessive after-hours expectations could be challenged under general fairness principles. Performance standards should not require 24/7 availability.

Probationary Remote Employees

Probation periods (maximum 12 months under the Employment Act) apply equally to remote hires. Performance evaluation during probation must still follow fair process, though the notice period is shorter (7 days).

9. Building a Remote Performance Culture (Prevention)

The best performance management strategy is one you rarely need to use formally:

  1. Set clear, measurable expectations from day one (output-based, not presence-based).

  2. Hold regular one-on-ones (weekly 30-minute video check-ins).

  3. Use collaborative tools that create natural visibility into work progress.

  4. Provide feedback continuously, not just annually.

  5. Invest in onboarding for remote hires: the first 90 days determine trajectory.

  6. Train managers on remote leadership: managing by outcomes, not observation.

  7. Document everything as a matter of routine, not just when things go wrong.

Conclusion

Managing performance issues for remote Kenyan employees requires the same legal rigour as managing in-office staff. The ELRC does not lower the bar for remote terminations. If anything, the evidential burden on employers is higher because they must demonstrate that the employee had the tools, support, and clarity needed to succeed from a distance. Document relentlessly, support genuinely, and follow the process.

Want to Learn More?

Explore more articles about Employer of Record services and hiring in Africa

View All Articles

Ready to Hire in Kenya?

Let Bossorec handle the compliance while you focus on building your team

Get Started Today